Don’t Let Them Kill Digital Assets

Under the new leadership of Gary Gensler, who many expect to take over on the 12th, some problems could arise. April, two days before Coinbase’s scheduled IPO, is confirmed as chairman of the SEC, could well be resolved.

We have no idea who’s in charge now, but they don’t seem very crypto-friendly.

Nowhere is this more evident than in the SEC’s difficult case against YouTube’s blockchain-based competitor LBRY.

Not only is it clear to everyone that the only crime of the project was that it was located in the United States, but this case also reinforces the suspicion that some U.S. officials, for whatever reason, are intentionally impeding innovation within their borders.

Claiming that LBRY loans, which are the epitome of versatile and programmable money, are indistinguishable from your traditional investment vehicles is an extremely thin interpretation of the Howey test, which the SEC continues to use as a major weapon in its war on digital assets.

There was no fraud here. Nobody complained. So who is the government really trying to protect?

Murderer cryptographer

Sorry for the choice of words, but it seems that many do not understand the broader implications of this matter.

If LBRY is sued, it would literally jeopardize the future of all cryptocurrencies, including Bitcoin and Ether.

The mere fact that Securities and Exchange Commission v. The fact that the Supreme Court’s Howey Co. decision from more than 70 years ago is still used as a deciding factor in the courts should give us an idea of the power of the common law.

Judges are usually guided by their previous decisions in similar cases, so a negative decision in this case could make it easier for them to overturn any project involving cryptographic tokens. DeFi, unforced tokens (NFT), smart contracts, and just about everything except maybe Stables could be on the chopping block.

The big cave here is geography. In many countries, innovators like LBRY can thrive freely, even if they have to make special concessions because they do not accept American users.

No matter what they try, it won’t stop the revolution. It’ll just float out to sea. Network 3.0, the Internet of values, is inevitable at this point. LBRY will also continue regardless of the outcome of this case.

Americans may soon need a virtual private network (VPN) to access large parts of the Internet, just like the Chinese. Oh, wait… It’s already happened.

What can I do?

It’s very simple. Write to your MP and ask for their support. You don’t say.

Although you can do it, I think most of you won’t.

Fortunately, there is a much less intrusive way to show your support if you support the cause.

Just visit the website created for this purpose, namely

There’s a great video on the homepage in which the great crypto-expert Naomi Brockwell explains the idiotic actions of the US regulators.

This FAQ is also worth reading, but more important is the petition, which for some reason only had 15,000 signatures at the time of writing.

Related Tags:

how can individuals benefit from a web3 enabled data economy?what is the main advantage of ocean protocol?,People also search for,Privacy settings,How Search works,what is the main advantage of ocean protocol?,how can individuals benefit from a web3 enabled data economy?

More from author

Related posts

Latest posts

Next Week, Tesla and MicroStrategy Will Release Reports on their Crypto Holdings, Bloomberg

MicroStrategy Inc. and software company Tesla Inc. have been in the news for the past week, as each company has been working on developing...

SEC delays decision on Wisdom Tree Bitcoin ETF

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has put the decision on a Bitcoin ETF on hold until September 30. The decision was initially expected...

Euro Forex Market Steady as ECB Results Awaited

The Euro’s buoyancy was underlined yesterday by a steady market in which traders put their money to work as the ECB’s decision on whether...